GRE作文argument寫作技巧介紹

GRE寫作部分，想要寫出一篇高分作文，同學們還是需要苦下功夫。那麼在具體的備考中，又有哪些寫作技巧能夠減少我們的備考障礙，更好地拿到寫作高分呢?下面小編爲大家整理了詳細的內容，供大家參考，希望幫助考生更好地提分。

GRE作文argument寫作技巧介紹

GRE作文中的Argument是分析一個論證過程，所以考生需要寫出一篇駁論。由於題目所給的Argument一般是不完整因而不可信的，所以我們的文章是以削弱爲主要形式的評論型文章

什麼是Argument?

Argument譯爲論證過程，指的是作者爲了說服他人而使用一個前提——結論式結構得出自己觀點的推理過程

一個完整的Argument包含以下四個要素

l Premise——前提，能直接退出結論的一個條件

l Assumption——假設，爲了使論證更可信而額外設定的條件

l Evidence——論據，爲了使論證更可信而引用的客觀事實

l Conclusion——結論，作者最終用於說服他人而得出的觀點、立場

一個說服力較強的，完整的argument通常包含多個Assumption+Evidence來支持文章整體結構。

爲什麼要寫Analysis?

從ARGUMENT結構角度來講：我們題庫中的Argument文章一般是Assumption和Evidence大量缺失甚至出現錯誤，導致原文的結論很容易無法得出的文章。

所有的ARGUMENT文章，其基本表現形式爲：“原文作者無法得出結論(因爲)——削弱條件1+削弱條件2+削弱條件3——因此作者結論無法得出，如果想得出結論，就必須考慮到可能的削弱條件(123)”。

詳解GRE作文2大扣分重災區

GRE寫作扣分主要原因1：觀點類問題

GRE寫作在論點上出問題的情況是非常多的，其中最主要的情況有兩種，一種是論點過於寬泛，另外一種則是論點過於狹窄。

a. 觀點過於寬泛

在各類教導寫作的材料中，大家應該時常會發現關於強調GRE寫作論點一定要寫得具體，越細越好的指導建議。而考生經常出現的問題就是會出現一些很寬泛的論點句，以至於在較短的篇幅裏並不能充分展開，甚至有時候會造成觀點重疊。GRE高分作文寫法步驟詳細指導

比如今年2月份的GRE考試中有一篇作文，題目要求探討關於移動電話對於現代人生活的影響。假如考生提煉出的觀點是“Mobile phones have changed our life greatly. ”這句只是說手機很大程度上改變了人們的生活，但是並未點明從哪些方面上帶來了改變，因此把這個觀點具化一下：“Mobile phones can serve as a connection to the Internet, which can be extremely convenient for obtaining information wherever you may be.”

而同樣是在2月份，還有一篇作文的題目則討論了關於廣告氾濫對於社會輿論造成的干擾。如果考生只是簡單寫“Advertising has bad effects on all of society. ”廣告有不良影響顯然是不夠的。我們需要寫出具體的方面，比如“Advertisements which exaggerate the function of the products may mislead the consumers.”

b. 論點過於狹窄

與論點過於寬泛相對的，則是一些考生把論點定得太過狹窄，自己把自己逼近了死衚衕以至於沒有展開的空間甚至沒有進一步支持的必要。這類句子與其說是觀點，倒不如說是事實的陳述或者只是舉了個例子而已。

4月第一次換庫的時候一篇曾經出現過幾次的作文題目，講的是某個地方當地人開展旅遊業的看法。有的考生直接把觀點寫成“There are more local residents engaged in tourism industry. ”這其實並非觀點，只是陳述了一個事實就是在當地越來越多人開始從事旅遊業，可改爲：“Tourism brings huge economic benefits to local residents.”就比較容易展開了。

1月份的GRE作文中也有一道討論不可再生燃料如何持續利用的題目，如果考生寫出“The consumption of fossil fuels increase in recent years. ”也等於是自己把話說死了，正確寫法是給出論述重點，假設原因，比如“The consumption of fossil fuels increasing in recent years results from two factors.”之後就會好寫很多。

GRE寫作扣分主要原因2：用詞問題

GRE寫作評分中關於用詞有一個非常具體的評判標準，demonstrates control of language, including diction and syntactic variety，即通過用詞用句的變化性有效地體現行文語言的多樣性。而許多中國考生被扣分，正是因爲用詞過於單調重複和口語化。下面給大家舉5個最常見的不地道且常被濫用的LOW詞：

a. Really

Example：The swimmer really performed admirably.

“Really”表示“真的”，有強調的作用。但很多時候“really”並沒有告訴讀者或聽者任何重要、有用的信息，缺乏說服力。如果你想要表達一個事實，不妨嘗試去掉“really”，反倒更讓信服。比如：The swimmer performed admirably.

b. Things/ Stuff

Example: “The article said a lot of things and stuff.”

Things和Stuff這兩個詞彙十分模糊，作者自己可以清楚地瞭解Things和Stuff代表的含義，但讀者顯然不能。Things和Stuff到底指什麼?爲什麼會有Things和Stuff?我如何獲得這些Things和Stuff?這都是讀者會產生的問題。所以與其圖一時省事，不如清晰地描述出你的想法，這樣你的寫出的句子纔會有力量。例如：The aricle discussed the principles of interactive design.

c. I believe/I feel/I think

Example: “I believe the author has a great point here…”

很多人認爲在觀點前加上“I believe/I feel/I think”可以表明立場，避免邏輯漏洞，也更容易讓人接受自己的想法。但如果對方本身對你的認可度不高，你的“I believe/I feel/I think”反而會引起對方的抵抗情緒。過度小心翼翼會讓你顯得沒有自信，不夠真誠。你完全可以說：“The researcher has a great point here.”

d. Was/Is/Are/Am

Example: “Theletter was mailed by Sally.”

使用Was/Is/Are/Am和不使用的區別在於被動和主動的區別。在這個例句中，Was/Is/Are/Am讓句式變成更爲複雜的被動，而在地道的英語思維中，應該儘可能少地使用被動語態;另一方面，當你使用被動句，句子的主旨也會隨之改變，從Sally變成了letter。英文寫作要做到簡潔有力，“Sally mailed the letter.”顯然比“The letter was mailed by Sally.”表達的更清晰。

e. Very

Example：Scientistsare very interested in finding out more about the duck-billed platypus“Substitute ‘damn’ every time you’re inclined to write‘very’; your editor will delete it and the writing will be just as it shouldbe.” — Mark Twain

very是最常被大家使用的一個單詞，但也是最蒼白的一個單詞。一句“very good”遠不如“wonderful”來得生動。要記住，讀者的時間非常寶貴，你的語言一定要精簡。

綜上所述，考生想要在GRE作文部分有所表現，那麼對於導致作文扣分的主要原因，就必須做到心裏有數。如果大家的寫作得分長期得不到提升，那麼就該放下筆來暫停練習，先找找原因再說了。

GRE寫作滿分範文1

Six?months?ago?the?region?of?Forestville?increased?the?speed?limit?for?vehicles?traveling?on?the?region's?highways?by?ten?miles?per?hour.??Since?that?change?took?effect,?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?in?that?region?has?increased?by?15?percent.??But?the?speed?limit?in?Elmsford,?a?region?neighboring?Forestville,?remained?unchanged,?and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.??Therefore,?if?the?citizens?of?Forestville?want?to?reduce?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?on?the?region's?highways,?they?should?campaign?to?reduce?Forestville's?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.??

The?argument?gives?statistics?of?increases?in?automobile?accidents?since?the?speed?limit?increased?six?months?ago?on?the?highways?of?Forestville.??The?argument?also?gives?a?statement?of?how?the?neighboring?region?of?Forestville,?did?not?increase?or?decrease?the?speed?limit.??It?remained?unchanged?and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.??The?argument?may?appeal?to?those?who?have?been?effected?by?the?increase?in?accidents,?but?it?does?not?give?an?emotional?appeal?overall.??We?are?relying?on?the?authors?statistics?but?we?don't?know?where?they?came?from?and?if?they?are?reliable.?The?argument?needs?more?examples?and?illustrations?to?get?his?point?across?to?more?people.??It?is?suggested?that?the?citizens?of?Forestville?campaign?to?reduce?Forestville's?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase,?but?it?is?usually?hard?to?start?a?campaign.?One?person?needs?to?take?action.??If?the?author?is?a?citizen?of?Forestville,?maybe?he?should?take?the?initiative.?Comments:?

This?seriously?flawed?critique?presents?only?one?idea?relevant?to?an?analysis?of?the?argument:?"The?argument?needs?more?examples?and?illustrations?to?get?his?point?across?to?more?people."??Everything?else?in?the?essay?is?either?summarizing?the?argument,?speculating,?or?offering?advice.??The?result?is?a?response?that?is?clearly?on?topic?but?that?provides?no?analysis?of?the?line?of?reasoning?in?the?argument.??

In?addition?to?the?lack?of?analysis,?the?writing?is?weak.??The?organization?is?loose,?although?not?illogical,?and?intended?meaning?is?sometimes?unclear?(e.g.,?"but?it?does?not?give?an?emotional?appeal?overall.").??For?these?reasons,?the?response?deserves?a?score?of?2?according?to?the?scoring?guide.

GRE寫作滿分範文2

Six?months?ago?the?region?of?Forestville?increased?the?speed?limit?for?vehicles?traveling?on?the?region's?highways?by?ten?miles?per?hour.??Since?that?change?took?effect,?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?in?that?region?has?increased?by?15?percent.??But?the?speed?limit?in?Elmsford,?a?region?neighboring?Forestville,?remained?unchanged,?and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.??Therefore,?if?the?citizens?of?Forestville?want?to?reduce?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?on?the?region's?highways,?they?should?campaign?to?reduce?Forestville's?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.??

When?we?compare?two?things,?we?like?to?put?them?on?the?same?background.?same?condition.??

For?the?fact?given?above,?in?the?same?time,?foundmentally,?the?two?region?have?the?same?traffic?condition,?except,?the?speedlimit?is?improved?in?one,?and?the?other?keep?the?same.?So?we?can?get?the?result?that?the?reason?of?the?difference?is?that?the?improved?speed?limit.?And?also?the?change?will?give?some?other?inconvinent?to?the?people?there.?For?example,?the?people?will?not?familiar?with?the?change,?have?some?problem?in?handle?the?speed.??

So,?what?I?think?is?that?the?citizen?should?show?the?government?the?statistic?number?of?the?difference.?Argue?with?them.?Comments:?

This?response?is?fundamentally?deficient?as?a?critique?for?two?reasons:??

--?although?the?writer?has?relied?heavily?on?the?language?of?the?topic,????it?is?clear?that?the?writer?has?no?real?control?of?language,?and?--?there?is?little?or?no?evidence?of?the?writer's?ability?to?develop?an????organized?response.?