當前位置

首頁 > 英語作文 > 英語作文範文 > 新gre作文題目之高頻題目彙總

新gre作文題目之高頻題目彙總

推薦人: 來源: 閱讀: 2.18W 次

爲了幫助大家備考gre作文,下面小編給大家帶來新gre作文題目之高頻題目彙總,希望大家會喜歡!

新gre作文題目之高頻題目彙總

新gre作文題目之高頻題目彙總

1. The way students and scholars interpret the materials they work with in their academic fields is more of personality than of training. Different interpretations come about when people with different personalities look at exactly the same objects, facts, data, or events and see different things.

2. As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and more mysterious.

3. There is no such thing as purely objective observation. All observation is subjective; it is always guided by the observer’s expectations or desires.

4. Students should memories facts only after they have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. Students who have learned only facts have learned very little.

5. In any academic area or professional field, it is just as important to recognize the limits of our knowledge and understanding as it is to acquire new facts and information.

6. The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants.

7. Critical judgment of work, in any given field has little value unless comes from someone who is an expert in that field.

小編也給大家整理出了GRE作文高頻題目之經典句式,考生可以參考使用。

1、The more…the more…句式的使用。人們越幸福,社會越穩定啦、等等

2、還有一些比較常用的:There is no denying that…/ there is no doubt that…

3、疑問句。用於開頭,來個設問句,在自問自答,提出自己觀點;用於段中,比如舉設想的例子:Can you imagine that…?/ How can one imagine…?

4、強調句的使用:It is people who…/ it is something that…

5、當你想表達“如果怎麼怎麼樣,就是另外一種情況”—虛擬語氣。爲什麼不來個虛擬倒裝?Were(Had) it…,something would......

GRE寫作滿分範文1

"In?our?time,?specialists?of?all?kinds?are?highly?over-rated.?We?need?more?generalists?—?people?who?can?provide?broad?perspectives."??

I?disagree?with?the?portion?of?the?"Specialists?of?all?kinds?are?highly?overated"?statement.?Specialists?are?persons?who?take?care?of?certain?tasks?or?a?specific?area?of?whatever?the?case?may?be.?These?persons?contibute?more?time?and?effort?than?those?with?general?titles.?the?specialists?are?the?ones?who?can?tell?or?give?the?client?more?details?on?what?is?happening?to?them.?The?generalist?can?only?give?broad?ideas?which?can?be?a?number?of?things.?The?specialist?narrows?the?ideas?down?to?the?specifics.?For?example?if?one?goes?to?a?"general?practioner?doctor"?for?pains?in?the?chest?area,?he?would?tell?the?client?that?the?poblem?may?be?heart?burns,?or?something?else?that's?not?be?so?serious,?depending?on?the?symptoms.?He?may?also?refer?him?to?a?cardiologist?to?be?sure?it's?not?any?thing?else.?The?point?I'm?making?is?that?specialist?are?people?who?can?help?us?out?even?more?that?our?generalist.?Also?the?fact?that?one?would?go?to?a?specialist?only?in?dire?needs.??

COMMENTARY?

The?response?presents?a?position?on?the?issue?but?the?development?of?that?position?is?seriously?flawed.??The?writer?begins?by?disagreeing?with?the?assertion?that?"?over-rated"?and?then?attempts?to?define?and?contrast?specialists?and?generalists.?The?attempt?is?unsuccessful,?partly?because?the?descriptions?are?vague?and?ill-conceived.??

Whereas?the?example?of?going?to?a?"general?practitioner?doctor"?is?certainly?relevant,?the?writer's?claim?that?a?general?practitioner?would?tell?a?patient?with?chest?pains?that?the?problem?"may?be?heart?burns?or?something?else?that's?not?so?serious"?seems?far-fetched.??

The?response?is?further?weakened?by?poor?word?choice?and?by?numerous?errors?in?sentence?structure,?usage,?and?grammar.?These?problems,?while?not?severe?enough?to?seriously?interfere?with?meaning,?contribute?to?the?overall?rating?of?"2."?

GRE寫作滿分範文2

"In?our?time,?specialists?of?all?kinds?are?highly?over-rated.?We?need?more?generalists?—?people?who?can?provide?broad?perspectives."??

In?today's?society,?there?are?many?people?who?feel?generalist?are?more?broad?than?specialists.?I?will?discuss?how?there?is?a?need?for?generalists?in?the?medical?field,?education,?and?the?work?place.??First,?I?will?discuss?how?there?is?a?need?for?generalists?in?the?medical?field.?A?generalist?in?this?area?would?be?straight?foward?with?clients.?For?instance,?in?explaining?to?a?patient?they?had?cancer.?A?specialist?would?use?wording?that?you?would?believe?everything?is?fine.??

Second,?I?will?discuss?how?there?is?a?need?for?generalists?in?the?education?field.?In?this?field?some?instructors?use?"big?words"?and?try?to?out?smart?themselves?with?there?own?thoughts?of?character.??Last,?I?will?discuss?how?there?is?a?need?for?generalists?in?the?workplace.?In?the?workplace?the?bosses?should?be?open?with?personell.?For?instance,?instead?of?acting?like?they?know?everything?they?should?be?open?to?knew?thoughts?and?ideas.????

COMMENTARY

On?the?surface,?this?essay?appears?to?present?an?organized?discussion?of?the?issue.?In?actuality,?there?are?fundamental?deficiencies?in?analysis?and?development.??

The?essay?begins?with?a?tautology:?"e?are?many?people?who?feel?generalist?are?more?broad?than?specialists."?Then,?in?the?three?short?paragraphs?that?follow,?the?writer?promises?to?discuss?"a?need?for?generalists"?in?a?specific?field,?but?none?of?these?discussions?materialize.??

The?rest?of?the?essay?only?confirms?the?sense?of?"fundamental?deficiency."?Rather?than?analyze?the?issue,?the?writer?unpersuasively?vilifies?specialists?as?people?who?use?their?power?to?deceive?and?mislead?others.??

Although?the?errors?(sentence?fragments,?incorrect?verb?tenses,?and?awkward?syntax)?are?persistent,?language?problems?alone?do?not?earn?this?essay?a?score?of?"1."?Rather,?this?response?fits?the?scoring?guide?criterion?of?showing?"little?evidence?of?the?ability?to?develop?or?organize?a?coherent?response?to?the?topic."?

GRE寫作滿分範文3

"It?is?unfortunate?that?today's?educators?place?so?much?emphasis?on?finding?out?what?students?want?to?include?in?the?curriculum?and?then?giving?it?to?them.??It?is?the?educators'?duty?to?determine?the?curriculum?and?the?students'?duty?to?study?what?is?presented?to?them."??

The?statement?above?conceals?intesting?connotations?far?above?curriculum?development.??Issues?of?classroom?control?and?development?of?scholarly?talents?are?at?stake,?not?simply?a?debate?over?which?books?are?acceptable?or?over?revisionist?histories.?

The?statement?itself?is?a?bit?misleading?in?that?in?my?experience,?student?control?over?curriculum?hardly?existed.??Each?year,?there?were?certain?course?offerings?made?available,?and?students?were?to?choose?from?those?offerings,?of?course?bearing?in?mind?requirements?for?graduation?set?forth?by?the?administration.??On?a?classroom?level,?the?immediate,?initial?material?may?have??been?somewhat?directed?by?the?students,?but?this?was?a?part?of?the?process?allowed?by?the?teacher/professor?in?order?to?gain?the?interest?and?attention?of?the?students.??However,?too?much?of?any?one?thing?becomes?problematic;?letting?students?set?the?curriculum,?as?with?letting?students?choose?and?design?their?own?major?in?college,?serves?ultimately?to?dilute?the?quality?of?the?educational?experience?unless?a?single?advisor?can?devote?significant?amounts?of?time?to?the?individual?student.??This?amount?of?time,?or?even??the?expense?to?the?student?of?this?individual?attention,?seem?to?indicate?that?resources?would?be?better?allocated?elsewhere.?

Of?course,?any?school?in?which?the?students?decide?"what?goes"?is?bound?to?have?problems?controlling?students.??Once?the?educators,?be?they?administrators?or?teachers,?are?under?the?control?of?students,?even?a?democratic?situation?would?be?like?holding?royalty?acountable?to?the?mob.?Presently,?students?hear?for?hours?that?they?should?not?forget?to?use?a?condom?in?the?heat?of?the?moment,?and?educators?think?the?message?gets?through,??while?half?the?kids?can't?even?remember?to?bring?a?pencil?to?class.???Students?go?to?school?not?to?simply?learn?the?Pythagorean?theorem,?but?to?learn?direction?and?receive?guidance.?This?cannot?occur?when?students?are??in?charge,?and?standards,?already?hard?to?find?in?America's?contemporary?public?schools,??will?become?unenforceable.??If?students?dictate?and?administrators?do,?students?will?never?learn?academic?responsibility,?and?if?they?can't?be?held?accountable?for?homework,?what?other?responsibilities?will?they?avoid?when?they?get?older?

But?in?another?sense,?teachers?and?students?do?exist?in?a?partnership?of?sorts.??Teachers?are?there?to?satisfy?the?needs?of?the?student,?and?the?student,?while?perhaps?not?being?the?most?experienced/?knowledgeable?person??on?what?his/her?needs?actually?are?(versus?wants),?at?least?should?be?afforded?some?say.???In?addition,?we?must?remember?what?the?purpose?of?education?is,?and?that?there?are?different?levels?of?education.? ??

In?high?school,?the?focus?is?not?so?much?on?learning?actual?material.??The?focus?is?on?developing?study?habits,?and?on?social?interaction.??The?best?secondary?schools?promote?an?environment?in?which?individual?creativity?and?pacing?can?be?developed,?where?students?are?taught?to?thinkon?their?own,?and?learn?to?debate?and?argue?in?a?scholarly?way,?through?writing?and?other?formal?methods?of?discourse.??Group?collaboration?and?interpersonal?skills?are?developed?and?honed.??The?actual?details?of?what?is?studied?and?tested?is?of?less?importance.??Whether?a?student?reads?Maya?Angelou,?or?Yeats,?or?Euripides?essentially?is?beside?the?point?as?long?as?a?student's?mind?is?cultivated,?not?just?their?ability?to?record?and?recite.??What?is?important?is?that?secondary?students?develop?and?grow?in?the?hands?of?the?professionals.?

The?secondary?educational?experience?is?designed?to?prepare?a?student?for?college.??It?is?in?college?where?the?individual?learns?to?examine?the?world?and?how?it?works,?and?the?individual's?place?in?it.?

As?for?duty,?it?is?the?educators'?duty?not?simply?to?determine?the?curriculum,?but?to?present?it?effectively.??They?cannot?half-heartedly?paint?it?on?the?blackboard,?they?must?enliven?it?and?actually?teach.??Hard?work?must?be?lauded,?while?freeloaders?are?punished.??These?are?the?duties?of?teachers,?and?the?duty?of?the?students?is?not?just?to?learn?or?study,?but?to?grow.?An?independent?mind?is?what?students?need,?and?that?mind?has?to?be?in?a?position?to?want?and?be?able?to?question?beyond?the?material?presented,?not?simply?to?question?its?legitimacy.?That?distinction,?though?subtle,?is?the?difference?between?letting?the?students?follow?a?self-destructive?course?of?premature?self-determination?on?the?one?hand?,?and?permitting?on?the?other?hand?the?fostering?of?great?talents?through?a?cooperative,?mentoring?relationship??

COMMENTARY?

This?is?an?insightful,?well-articulated?discussion?of?curricular?responsibility?and?the?larger?issue?of?academic?responsibility.??After?a?brief?introduction?examining?assumptions?implied?by?the?topic,?the?writer?skillfully?develops?the?position?that?letting?students?dictate?the?curriculum?could?dilute?the?educational?experience.??Allowing?students?to?determine?the?curriculum,?the?writer?claims,?will?deny?them?the?guidance?and?direction?they?need?to?learn?academic?responsibility.??

The?line?of?reasoning?is?strengthened?by?the?discussion?of?how?teachers?and?students?can?work?in?partnership?to?satisfy?the?needs?of?students.??The?argument?is?further?advanced?with?concrete?examples?from?high?school?courses?showing?how?teachers?provide?guidance?for?students?through?group?collaboration,?development?of?interpersonal?skills,?and?preparation?for?college.??The?examples?are?varied?(from?condom?use?to?reading?Angelou,?Yeats,?or?Euripedes)?and?used?effectively?to?further?support?the?writer's?position.? ??

In?the?conclusion,?the?writer?thoughtfully?discusses?how?educators?should?not?only?determine?the?curriculum?but?present?it?in?an?enlivened?and?appropriate?manner.??The?final?sentence,?contrasting?a?"self-destructive?course?of?premature?self-determination"?and?"a?cooperative,?mentoring?relationship,"?ties?the?essay?together.???

The?essay?is?clearly?organized,?although?the?writer?does?not?rely?on?conventional?phrases?(such?as?"first,"?"second,"?etc.)?to?signal?the?organizational?structure.??Instead,?the?organization?and?focus?progress?through?the?line?of?reasoning?that?moves?fluently?and?coherently?from?one?paragraph?to?the?next.?

Language?use?is?generally?precise?and?effective?(e.g.,?"holding?royalty?accountable?to?the?mob"),?and?sentence?structure?is?well?controlled?(e.g.,?"hard?work?must?be?lauded,?while?freeloaders?are?punished").??The?few?errors?are?minor,?the?kind?that?can?easily?be?made?--?and?forgiven?--?under?testing?conditions.?

This?outstanding?response?received?a?score?of?6.