爲什麼我的GRE作文只有3分?突破寫作分數瓶頸你需要先解決這些問題
GRE寫作中國考生的平均得分只有3分左右並不算理想。而許多考生之所以拿不到作文高分，都是因爲文章中存在各種寫法問題而並非平時練習不夠積極認真。那麼哪些問題更容易影響大家的作文成績呢?下面小編就爲考生講解GRE寫作的常見扣分問題並分享應對方法。
爲什麼我的GRE作文只有3分?突破寫作分數瓶頸你需要先解決這些問題
寫作速度偏慢導致文章篇幅不夠內容有限
在新GRE作文中的另一個普遍問題是寫作速度太慢，這顯然是因爲在考試前所作的準備不夠充分。GRE考試的寫作除了開頭段和結尾段，中間一般應該寫三段。但是考生在規定時間內往往只能寫兩段，而且字數也不夠，只能寫400字左右。GRE寫作雖然沒有字數要求，但是一篇較好的、成熟的，能夠充分展示自己觀點的GRE作文，一般應在600字左右，或者是600字以上。由此可見，一篇400字左右的文章在內容上是不夠充實的。
邏輯論證缺乏說服力沒有可讀性
在闡述思想觀點之後，缺乏有力的例證去支持所闡述觀點。或者總是引用每個人都耳熟能詳的例證，例如目前最流行的例證有兩個B和兩個E，兩個B即Bill Gates和Bill Clinton。兩個E即Einstein和Edison。並不是這些例證不恰當或不足以說明問題，而是如果每一位GRE考試的考生都把愛迪生髮明電燈作爲例證，都引用愛因斯坦所說的成功是百分之九十九的勤勞加上百分之一的天分，那麼自己的文章就顯得平庸乏味，不吸引人。同時，也說明考生的知識面狹窄，視野不開闊。
對問題的分析流於表面缺乏深度
在習作中沒有能夠表現出對題目的複雜性的理解，有時考生用簡單應對TOEFL作文的方法來對付新GRE作文，這是錯誤的。例如，當題目中的論述沒有明確說明，但其中卻隱含由這種論述可能帶來的或可能產生的影響時，即implications(隱含意義)，往往在考生的作文中被忽略。還有，沒有對題目的statement進行qualification，即：對原來的題目進行分析，或者是縮小它的範圍。因爲GRE的題目往往是比較寬泛的，直接針對如此寬泛的題目寫作是非常困難的，所以必須在文章的第一段中對題目進行整理。最後一個問題是在闡述自己觀點的時候，缺乏對對立觀點予以應有程度的承認。
作文結尾段重複度太高缺乏原創性
還有一個非常關鍵也是獲得高分至關重要的問題是寫作最後一段時不應該只是簡單的重複第一段的內容和語言。寫作最後一段應該換一種說法，應該paraphrase第一段的要義。這點雖然與及格分數不甚相關，但是與GRE作文是否能獲得最高分數息息相關。這個弱點往往是由於同學們非常缺乏寫作語彙(working vocabulary)所致。GRE考生大都是大學生，或是在校，或是即將畢業，在閱讀方面的英文詞彙量大大超過了中學生，但在寫作詞彙上卻與中學生相差不多，這是在備考時需要解決的問題。
如何解決上述新GRE作文問題，小編給出以下幾條建議：
多準備針對性素材提升論述說服力
在備考過程中要多準備例子，並把它們一一寫下來，進行分類。一個例子往往可以應對好幾個同類的題目，這樣做是效率最高的辦法。
堅持寫作練習克服畏難情緒
我們都害怕寫作文，想到要練習寫一整篇文章，往往就沒有了信心。其實我們可以從練習寫作開頭段，然後設計文章的提綱開始。寫開?a href="">範文芄蝗夢頤且鄖崴梢壞愕男那樽攀諫RE寫作的準備，並且迅速瞭解所有的題目，因爲GRE的題目數量是固定的。
儲備積極詞彙，用時得心應手。從備考的開始就要着手增加working vocabulary, 當然也包含詞組，成語。平時背的詞彙往往只是看到它能知道其中文的某個翻譯意思，但是我們卻不能靈活運用這些詞彙進行表達，更不用說在短暫的GRE寫作考試時間內用它們遣詞造句了。
GRE寫作滿分範文1
"In?our?time,?specialists?of?all?kinds?are?highly?over-rated.?We?need?more?generalists?—?people?who?can?provide?broad?perspectives."??
Specialists?are?not?overrated?today.?More?generalists?may?be?needed,?but?not?to?overshadow?the?specialists.?Generalists?can?provide?a?great?deal?of?information?on?many?topics?of?interest?with?a?broad?range?of?ideas.?People?who?look?at?the?overall?view?of?things?can?help?with?some?of?the?large?problems?our?society?faces?today.?But?specialists?are?necessary?to?gain?a?better?understanding?of?more?in?depth?methods?to?solve?problems?or?fixing?things.???
One?good?example?of?why?specialists?are?not?overrated?is?in?the?medical?field.?Doctors?are?necessary?for?people?to?live?healthy?lives.?When?a?person?is?sick,?he?may?go?to?a?general?practitioner?to?find?out?the?cause?of?his?problems.?Usually,?this?kind?of?"generalized"?doctor?can?help?most?ailments?with?simple?and?effective?treatments.?Sometimes,?though,?a?sickness?may?go?beyond?a?family?doctor's?knowledge?or?the?prescribed?treatments?don't?work?the?way?they?should.?When?a?sickness?progresses?or?becomes?
diagnosed?as?a?disease?that?requires?more?care?than?a?family?doctor?can?provide,?he?may?be?referred?to?a?specialist.?For?instance,?a?person?with?constant?breathing?problems?that?require?hospitalization?may?be?suggested?to?visit?an?asthma?specialist.?Since?a?family?doctor?has?a?great?deal?of?knowledge?of?medicine,?he?can?decide?when?his?methods?are?not?effective?and?the?patient?needs?to?see?someone?who?knows?more?about?the?specific?problem;?someone?who?knows?how?it?begins,?progresses,?and?specified?treatments.?This?is?an?excellent?example?of?how?a?generalized?person?may?not?be?equipped?enough?to?handle?something?as?well?as?a?specialized?one?can.??
Another?example?of?a?specialist?who?is?needed?instead?of?a?generalist?involves?teaching.?In?grammar?school,?children?learn?all?the?basic?principles?of?reading,?writing,?and?arithematic.?But?as?children?get?older?and?progress?in?school,?they?gain?a?better?understanding?of?the?language?and?mathematical?
processes.?As?the?years?in?school?increase,?they?need?to?learn?more?and?more?specifics?and?details?about?various?subjects.?They?start?out?by?learning?basic?math?concepts?such?as?addition,?subtraction,?division,?and?multiplication.?A?few?years?later,?they?are?ready?to?begin?algebraic?concepts,?geometry,?and?calculus.?They?are?also?ready?to?learn?more?advanced?vocabulary,?the?principles?of?how?all?life?is?composed?and?how?it?functions.?One?teacher?or?professor?can?not?provide?as?much?in?depth?discussion?on?all?of?these?topics?as?well?as?one?who?has?learned?the?specifics?and?studied?mainly?to?know?everything?that?is?currently?known?about?one?of?these?subjects.?Generalized?teachers?are?required?to?begin?molding?students?at?a?very?early?age?so?they?can?get?ready?for?the?future?ahead?of?them?in?gaining?more?facts?about?the?basic?subjects?and?finding?out?new?facts?on?the?old?ones.??
COMMENTARY?
The?essay?presents?a?strong?analysis?of?the?complexities?of?the?issue.??
This?writer's?argument?is?rooted?in?two?extended?examples,?both?of?which?are?well?chosen?and?effective.?The?example?in?paragraph?2?begins?with?a?discussion?of?the?need?in?the?medical?field?for?general?
practitioners?as?well?as?specialists?and?moves?into?an?example?within?the?example?(breathing?problems?and?the?need?for?an?asthma?specialist)?to?illustrate?the?point.?This?extension?from?the?general?to?the?specific?also?characterizes?the?example?in?paragraph?3.?Overall,?the?essay?is?well-organized,?in?part?because?the?writer?connects?ideas?through?the?use?of?appropriate?transitions:?"but,"?"usually,"?and?"for?instance,"?among?others.?
While?the?writer?handles?language?and?syntax?well,?several?bothersome?problems?keep?this?otherwise?well-argued?paper?out?of?the?6?category.?The?problems?vary?from?the?lack?of?a?pronoun?referent?("When?a?sickness?progresses?or?becomes?diagnosed,...he?may?be?referred?to?a?specialist")?to?an?error?in?parallel?structure?("...how?it?begins,?progresses?and?specified?treatments"),?to?loose?syntax?and?imprecise?
language?("Generalized?teachers?are?required?to?begin?molding?students?at?a?very?early?age?so?they?can?get?ready?for?the?future?ahead?of?them?in?gaining?more?facts?about?the?basic?subjects?and...")
GRE寫作滿分範文2
"In?our?time,?specialists?of?all?kinds?are?highly?over-rated.?We?need?more?generalists?—?people?who?can?provide?broad?perspectives."??
The?need?for?generalists?is?undeniable?but?one?can?not?underestimate?the?need?and?importance?of?specialists.?The?medical?profession?is?a?good?example?of?an?area?that?requires?both?generalists?and?specialists.?If?there?were?no?generalists?in?the?profession?there?would?be?no?one?to?help?patients?determine?when?a?specialist?was?needed.?There?are?certain?problems?that?a?general?practitioner?can?take?care?of?and?there?are?other?problems?that?are?out?of?his?or?her?league.?The?general?practitioner?is?the?an?appropriate?place?to?start?when?a?patient?develops?a?problem.?Many?times?the?general?practitioner?is?more?than?capable?of?handling?problems?that?arise?and?other?times?he?or?she?is?unable?to?fully?take?control?of?the?patient's?care.?It?isn't?a?fault?with?the?general?practitioners.?There?is?just?too?much?to?know?for?any?one?person?to?be?an?expert?on?all?topics.?It?takes?people?years?to?become?experts?on?a?single?topic,?never?mind?being?an?expert?on?everything?in?the?medical?profession.??
I?am?currently?working?in?a?large?teaching?hospital?where?the?need?for?both?general?practitioners?and?specialists?is?obvious.?When?a?patient?is?admitted?to?a?general?medicine?floor,?the?general?medicine?physicians?are?not?always?able?to?deal?with?every?problem?the?patient?has?without?some?help?from?the?specialists.?It?would?be?unrealistic,?not?to?mention?unfair?to?the?general?practitioners,?to?expect?the?general?practitioners?to?know?everything?about?everything.?The?key?is?to?know?where?everyone's?knowledge?and?area?of?expertise?lie?and?use?their?strengths?to?optimize?patient?care.??
On?the?general?medicine?team?in?which?I?worked,?the?team?would?constantly?be?requesting?consults?from?specialists.?Whether?it?be?a?renal,?psychiatric,?orthopedic,?rehabilitation,?speech,?gastroenterologist,?or?any?other?specialist,?their?input?was?constantly?needed?and?used?to?get?the?patient?well?as?quickly?as?possible.?The?list?of?specialists?can?go?on?longer?than?one?would?think?and?it?is?just?impossible?for?one?person?to?know?everything?about?each?one?of?them.??
Although?the?need?for?generalists?is?apparent,?it?would?be?hard?to?survive?without?specialists,?also.?When?a?person?acts?as?a?generalist,?they?know?little?bit?about?everything,?but?certainly?not?a?totally?inclusive?knowledge?of?everything.?The?specialist?is?there?to?help?add?the?expertise?and?inclusive?knowledge?that?the?generalist?may?be?lacking.?The?most?important?thing?to?remember?with?specialists?and?generalists?is?to?recognize?both's?strengths?and?weaknesses?and?capitalize?on?the?strengths?to?achieve?whatever?goal?may?be?desired.??
COMMENTARY?
Overall,?this?is?a?competent?response?to?the?topic.?The?writer?disputes?the?claim?that?"specialists?are?over-rated"?and?argues?from?the?position?that?both?specialists?and?generalists?are?needed.?The?single?extended?example?clearly?supports?the?premise?of?the?argument?as?the?writer?compares?the?roles?and?responsibilities?of?generalists?and?specialists?in?the?medical?profession.?By?paragraph?3,?however,?the discussion?falters,?and?the?concluding?paragraph?does?little?more?than?repeat?ideas?presented?in?the?first?two?paragraphs.??
This?essay?displays?generally?adequate?control?over?syntax?and?usage,?and?the?word?choice,?while?appropriate,?lacks?precision.?
GRE寫作滿分範文3
"In?our?time,?specialists?of?all?kinds?are?highly?over-rated.?We?need?more?generalists?—?people?who?can?provide?broad?perspectives."??
Generalists?have?the?ideas?and?beliefs?of?what?America?is?made?of.?America's?wealth?of?knowledge?can?be?related?to?the?generalists?of?the?past?generations?and?the?original?leaders?of?our?Constitution?Period?that?helped?shape?our?great?nation.?If?our?former?leaders?would?have?not?been?generalists?when?creating?our?country's?Constitution?in?the?late?1770's,?American?generations?of?would?have?been?burdened?with?the?constant?understanding?that?they?are?doomed?to?failure.??
The?fact?that?our?past?leaders?were?not?specialists?gave?the?creation?of?the?Constitution?the?ability?to?be?changed?through?amendments?passed?by?our?represented?leaders?of?today.?The?Constitution?was?created?with?the?ability?to?adapt?to?the?countries?needs?and?demands?in?running?our?society?as?it?changes?over?time.?The?generalists?approach?to?this?creation?of?a?non-specialized?Constitution?shows?the?need?for?todays?generations?to?continue?with?the?beliefs?that?a?specialist?would?not?follow.??
America?has?learned?from?it's?past?and?has?done?what?it?can?to?make?the?changes?through?adaption.?America's?greatness?has?been?from?the?generalist?leaders?of?the?past,?thinking?for?the?Americans?of?the?future.?Americans?with?a?broad?perspective?is?what?will?continue?to?lead?our?great?nation?into?the?twenty-first?century.??
COMMENTARY?
This?response?displays?some?competence?but?is?flawed?by?imprecise?use?of?language?and?limited?analysis?of?the?issue.??
The?writer?supports?the?claim?that?generalists?are?preferable?to?specialists,?offering?as?evidence?the?historical?example?of?the?generalists?who?created?the?U.S.?Constitution.?The?example,?while?relevant,?is?not?adequately?developed.?The?middle?paragraph?traces?the?flexibility?of?the?U.S.?Constitution?to?the?generalist?orientation?of?18th?century?leaders,?but?the?ideas?in?the?first?paragraph?are?too?vaguely?expressed?to?contribute?to?this?discussion,?and?the?final?paragraph?consists?of?unsubstantiated?generalities.??
Frequent?minor?errors?in?punctuation,?pronoun?use,?and?verb?tense,?as?well?as?imprecise?syntax?and?phrasing?(e.g.,?"Generalists?have?the?ideas?and?beliefs?of?what?America?is?made?of.?"?and?"?creation?of?the?Constitution?the?ability?to...")?contribute?to?the?overall?inadequacy?of?this?response.
