紐西蘭：網路挑釁將被判刑

Internet trolls face up to two years' jail in New Zealand under a controversial new law which bans “harmful digital Communications”.
紐西蘭出臺一項尚有爭議的新法案，禁止“有害數字資訊”，在網上釋出挑釁文字或將入獄兩年。

And under a parallel amendment toNew Zealand's Crimes Act, a person who tells another to kill themselves faces up to three years in prison.
而根據紐西蘭同時通過的一項《刑事罪行法》修正案，慫恿他人自殺者也將面臨三年監禁。

The law will help mitigate the harm caused by cyber-bullying and give victims a quick and effective means of redress, supporters said.
支持者聲稱，該法律將有助於減輕網路欺凌造成的傷害，是給受害者一個快速和有效的補償手段。

But critics said the law harms free speech and its fine print could threaten public interest journalism in the country.
但批評者稱該法律侵犯了言論自由，其細則可能威脅到公眾利益新聞。

Under the Harmful Digital Communications Act in effect from this week, anyone convicted of “causing harm by posting digital communication” faces two years in prison and a $50,000 (NZ) (£6,500) fine, while businesses face fines of up to $200,000 (NZ).
《有害數字資訊法案》從本週開始實施，所有因為“釋出數字資訊而造成傷害”的人都將面臨兩年的監禁和5萬紐西蘭元的罰款，涉事企業則面臨高達20萬紐西蘭元的罰款。

Harmful communications can include truthful as well as false information, and “intimate visual recordings” such as nude or seminude pictures or video shared without permission.
有害資訊包括真實或虛假的資訊，和“親密的視覺記錄”，如未經許可共享的全裸或半裸照片或視訊。

The bill was introduced after a public outcry over the horrific "Roast Busters” scandal, in which a group of teenage boys fromAucklandwas accused of sexually assaulting drunk, under age girls and boasting about the acts on social media.
該法案推出之前，公眾曾對令人震驚的“Roast Busters”醜聞進行抗議。該事件中，一群奧克蘭的青少年被指控對醉酒的低齡少女進行性侵併且在社交媒體上對自己的行為大肆吹噓。

But in an editorial, New Zealand’s Dominion Post said while the law's intentions were good, it went too far and could "pick up in its drift-net the sorts of noise and criticism that make for the talk of a free society”.
但《紐西蘭郵報》的一篇社論認為，雖然法律的意圖是好的，但規定過了線，它可能會“結束一個自由社會的各種聲音和批評”。

Noting it effectively bans online communications judged “indecent”, “false” or “used to harass an individual”, the Post asked if reports on political expense scandals, or cartoons that mock religious figures, may also be banned under the legislation.
注意到該法規定所有被認定為“不雅”，“錯誤”或“用於騷擾他人“的網路資訊都將被禁止，《紐西蘭郵報》提出疑問，稱政治費用醜聞和嘲笑宗教人物的漫畫是否也要依照該法被禁止。

The bill passed the New Zealand parliament with an overwhelming 116 to 5 majority.
該法案在紐西蘭議會以116比5的壓倒性勝利通過。

Speaking against the bill, Greens MP Gareth Hughes said while its intent was noble, its definition of “harm" was “irresponsibly broad”, and said the law could damage journalism in the country.
綠黨議員加雷斯·休斯對該法案表示反對，他表示，雖然其目的是高尚的，它定義的“傷害”是“寬泛的，不負責任的”，並稱該法律可能會損害紐西蘭的新聞行業。

Arguing what was not an offence offline should not be an offence online, Mr Hughes criticised the fact reporters were not exempt from the legislation, which he said may prevent them publishing online the same story about a corrupt MP which would be perfectly legal to publish in a newspaper.
休斯先生認為，線下不算冒犯的言論在線上也不應該歸為冒犯言論。他批評稱，該法案未對記者免責，這就有可能阻止他們把一篇發在報紙上完全沒問題的揭露貪腐議員的文章釋出在網路上。

Vocabulary
Internet troll: 網路巨魔（在網上發表過激言論挑起爭端或者激怒網友的人）
fine print: 條文，細則
indecent: 不得體的