託福寫作環境類的話題寫作思路
在託福寫作中，環境類話題主要涉及到的是環境和經濟的選擇、環境污染的危害以及治理環境問題的方法等話題。今天小編就給大家介紹一下託福寫作環境類的話題寫作思路。
託福寫作環境類的話題寫作思路
思路拓展一：環境保護
?環境保護需要得到國家政策的支持;
?提高公民的環保意識，是環境保護的基礎;
?引入、開發新資源，替換污染能源。
例1：Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Use new able sources of energy (sun, wind, water) will soon replace fossil fuels such as gas, oil, and coal.
這道題目主要是關於“新能源代替就能源的趨勢“，選擇同意題目觀點。回答這類問題的關鍵在於能源之間的區別，可以運用第三條思路。在環境方面的話，新能源是靠自然界的風、水、熱來積累能源，沒有污染;而傳統能源(煤、油、氣)都會在使用的時候排放有害物質。
例2：Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: The environmental issue is too complex to be solved by the individuals.
這道題目是關於“個人無法解決複雜的環境問題“。這個題目最大的問題就是說的過於絕對，由此作爲突破口，只要能夠找到一個理由，就可以充分反駁題目觀點。那麼個人能夠做什麼呢?這裏就運用到第二個思路” 提高公民的環保意識，是環境保護的基礎“。個人可以宣傳環境保護，也要從自身做起，保護環境。
思路拓展二：節約
?節約資源，就能夠減少浪費，從而避免環境污染;
?資源耗費，就會帶動資源的再生產，帶來環境問題;
例題：Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Is it more important to use land for human use such as farming, industry than to save for endangered animals.
這道題目是關於“工廠和農業用地比瀕危動物用地更加重要“。這道題目一定是從反面來回答比較簡單，這樣就不會和”動物保護“產生矛盾。其實用語動物保護的土地實際上對於土地本身是有益的，而生產用地會造成土壤流失和污染，從而和”節約資源“聯繫起來。
思路拓展三：健康
?環境污染帶來健康威脅(呼吸)
?環境問題直接造成人們的健康危害，直接危害人類的生存問題。
例題：Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: The government should give priority to improving healthcare than to solving environmental problems.
這道題目是關於“政府應該將醫療保健放在首位，而不是環境問題“，對於這道題目而言，兩個方面都是非常重要的，所以建議大家運用”折中“的寫作方式。不過，考生在論述環境問題的時候，可以結合環境問題對於健康的危害來說，從而例證環境保護的重要性。
託福寫作的思路問題可以這麼解決
先來看道託福寫作題目：
Agree or disagree: technology has made our lives more complicated rather than simpler.
題幹旨在讓考生們去描述科技對於我們生活的好壞，但並沒有個科技任何的描述。
再來看到雅思寫作題目：
We have been living in the nuclear age now for over half a century. Since the first atomic bombs were developed, nuclear technology has provided governments with the ability to totally destroy the planet. Yet the technology has been put to positive use as an energy source and in certain areas of medicine.
To what extent is nuclear technology a danger to life on Earth? What are the benefits and risks associated with its use?
題幹旨在考察同學們對於核科技的好壞分析，但題幹卻描述了核科技在現代生活中具體一個方面的作用，也就是政府能夠用來研製出核武器。
大家來看下這兩道題目的區別，同時考察同學們對於一個具有爭議性的觀點。託福寫作題目的出題角度會更加的抽象。而雅思寫作題目會給出一個細節的描述，這就可給各位考生們一個啓發去分析這個題幹。
我想從託福寫作和雅思寫作題目的對比中來和各位同學們談談寫作中例子細節的展開。
回到一開始的那道獨立寫作題目：Agree or disagree: technology has made our lives more complicated rather than simpler.
題幹讓我們去描述科技使得我們的生活簡潔還是複雜。我們也應該從生活中去切入，思考下我們現在生活中有哪些便利和不便是由科技所帶來的。
例如生活在北方的同學就能到想到霧霾，那我們在深究下霧霾所產生的原因和霧霾所帶來的後果。
現邏輯就就會很清晰了：
原因：工廠的污染物排放，大量汽車的尾氣排放等引起的。
結果：產生了霧霾
後果：出行戴口罩;容易患呼吸道疾病;能見度降低，交通事故率增加;肺癌死亡人數增加
這種邏輯思考方式，魔君在課上稱爲：線性思考方式，也就是找一件事情發生的原因，以及分析這件事情所產生的後果。
對應線性的邏輯思考方式，能夠對應魔君課上常講的一例法論證。
當然還存在另外一思考方式，魔君在課上稱爲：平行思考方式，也就是去分析你所想到的例子平行對等物，例如霧霾我們劃分到空氣污染的一個上級名詞，但包括在空氣污染裏的下一級名詞還有哪些呢?有：全球變暖;臭氧層空洞導致的紫外線過多;酸性排放物過多導致的酸雨等。
對於平行的邏輯思考方式，能夠對應魔君課上常講的多例法論證。
這裏就能夠解答很多同學問魔君的一個問題，我如何能像您一樣隨意的就能夠打出600+的文章呢。那麼答案很明顯了，就是結合使用線性和平行兩種思考方式去展開自己的文章。
託福寫作解析:美國環保認證法
託福綜合寫作閱讀材料：
In an effort to encourage ecologicallysustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuingcertifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by onserving resources and recycling materials. Companies that receive thiscertification can attract customers by advertising their product as Ecocertified. Around the world, many wood companies have adopted new, ecologicallyfriendly practices in order to receive Eco certification. However, it is unlikelythat wood companies in the United Stated will do the same, for several reasons.
爲了能過促進林業的可持續發展，有個國際組織開始着手給那些達到了環保和再生利用要求的木材公司頒發認證。獲得認證的公司可以在廣告商宣傳自己是環保的，進而吸引消費者。在全球範圍內來看，爲了能得到環保認證，很多木材公司已經開始採用了環保策略。然而，就美國的公司來講不太會採取同樣的措施，原因如下。
First, American consumers are exposed to somuch advertising that they would not value or even pay attention to the Ecocertification label. Because so many mediocre products are labeled “new” or“improved,” American consumers do not place much trust in advertising claims ingeneral.
首先，由於每天接受大量廣告的轟炸，美國消費者對於環保標籤並不是很在意。由於很多的普通產品都標榜“創新”或者“升級”，美國消費者對於廣告上生成的東西基本上不怎麼信任。
Second, Eco certified wood will be moreexpensive than uncertified wood because in order to earn Eco certification, awood company must pay to have its business examined by a certification additional cost gets passed on to consumers – American consumers tend tobe strongly motivated by price, and therefore they are likely to choose cheaperuncertified wood products. Accordingly, American wood companies will prefer tokeep their prices low rather than obtain Eco certification.
第二，環保認證後的木材會比普通木材價格昂過，因爲木材公司必須向認證機構支付審覈費用才能得到相關的認證。這份額外的支出將會轉嫁給消費者，而美國的消費者對於價格非常敏感。因而，他們將傾向於選擇便宜的沒有認證的產品。因而，美國的木材公司還是會選擇低價格而非環保認證。
Third, although some people claim that italways makes good business sense for American companies to keep up with thedevelopments in the rest of the world, this argument is not uing certification would make sense for American wood companies only ifthey marketed most of their products abroad. But that is not the case –American wood businesses sell most of their products in the United States,catering to a very large customer base that is satisfied with themerchandise.
第三，儘管有人聲稱這樣可以使美國的公司保持敏銳的商業觸覺，跟上世界發展的腳步。但是，這樣的說法是站不住腳的。只有當美國的木材公司主要市場是針對海外的時候，追求環保認證才變得有意義。但事實卻並非如此。美國木材公司的產品主要在美國銷售，而滿足了主要消費者的需求就可以保證商業運行順暢。
託福綜合寫作閱讀部分需要提取的觀點是：
- Main point: 環保認證對於美國木材公司意義不大
- Sub point 1:美國消費者對於廣告上的環保認證並不信任
- Sub point 2:環保認證會提高產品價格，而美國的消費者對於價格敏感
- Sub point 3:這項認證只對海外市場有效，而美國木材公司的市場主要在國內
託福寫作模板:公共交通
託福寫作模板及範文參考：
Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways，or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses，trains，subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay.
託福寫作範文參考：
Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways or on improving public transportations? There seems to be a difficult problem since many reasons should be involved. However， after carefully pondering it， I buttress the last one， spending the money on improving public transportation. The reasons are presented below：
There is no denying that improving the public transportation will surely alleviate the pollution given off by enormous cars. If a city has not a developed public transportation， the air will be polluted more heavily. What a dirty environment we will live in! Every day breathing into the air filled with the flour of the gasoline， seeing the sky with the dull color will be the title of our life.
So the essence of environment has been realized by an increasingly number of people， to the governments， the protection of environment is especially an undeniable mission. Another reason I agree with it is that developed public transportation will decrease the frequency of the traffic jams. Perhaps no worse word than “traffic jams” exists， to the businessmen who believe in “Time is money”. Traffic jams not only cost the people time and expense， but also create a bad mood for work. It greatly decreases the efficiency of the whole city. I imagine how can a city whose avenue full of traffic jams develop its economics?
Finally， I want to say that improving the public transportation provide a great number of ways of transportation for most of the poor people who can not afford to buy a car. It is known that our citizens is not made of only people who has the ability to own a car， but the very poor people are also included. I believe that however the technology is improved， the public apparatus should not be ignored， because it serves the people all over the city.
Nevertheless， the private transportation has its own advantages， for instance， it can save a lot of time in some cases， provide some convenience for people. But improving on roads and highways is advantageous only conditionally. Based on the above discussion， I agree with the opinion that the government should spend money on improving public transportation not only it can protect environment and save time for people， but it also can create a convenient environment for all the citizens.
