託福寫作話題解析——環境類

爲了幫助大家備考託福寫作，提高託福分數，下面小編給大家帶來託福寫作話題解析——環境類，望喜歡！

託福寫作話題解析——環境類

雖說環境問題是託福獨立寫作中的熟臉，我們生活中也經常會談論到它。但就是這樣一個貌似無處不在的熱點詞，在實際寫作中論述起來卻比屌絲娶個白富美還難。有的同學一看到關於環境問題的題目就頓時覺得大腦轉速不夠喉頭髮緊腸胃打結，真是不會再愛了啊，除了不亂扔不吐痰多種樹木少用煤就沒話說了啊?看這句Beijing is regularly hit by extended bouts of choking, acrid smog, with heavy industries and car-use both among the key culprits.　既然說到環境問題，那麼就讓我們來看看目前人們面臨着什麼樣子的環境問題吧。面臨環境問題怎麼說呢?“be faced with”?這如同滿大街的人都用iPhone一樣，託福評分老師簡直要哭了。看看原文，一個“hit”簡潔有力，還讓人有一種撲面而來精神一震的感覺，北京被“extended bouts of choking, acrid smog”也就是大面積的嗆人的霧霾霧霾擊中了，那這影響還能不惡劣嗎?而導致霧霾的罪魁禍首就是重工業和汽車。等等，罪魁禍首怎麼說?--key culprits!

霧霾影響如此之惡劣，政府也迅速採取了措施ing will ban the consumption of high-polluting fuels in downtown areas by 2020, the municipal environmental protection authority said.新聞說北京市區將要在2020年前禁止燃燒high-polluting fuels。這是北京市的一個政策，旨在大幅度降低空氣污染。這裏的high-polluting fuels是指“高污染燃料”。高污染燃料的範圍包括coal, fuel oil, petroleum coke, combustible waste, biomass fuels(煤炭、燃料油、石油焦炭、可燃廢棄物、生物質燃料)等。這些燃料是北京霧霾的重要污染源之一，所以是北京市政府着重治理的對象。而且“禁止燃燒”怎麼說的來着?人家用的可不是do not burn，看好了，新聞裏說的是ban the consumption of。

　　託福寫作環境類詞彙

ystem 生態系統

ogical balance/equilibrium 生態平衡

iversity 生物多樣性

ainable development 可持續發展

erve, preserve 節約使用，保護

ronmentally friendly, environmentalists 對環境無害的，環保主義者

tries must join forces/make concerted efforts/unite to combat/tackle/solve/address environmental problems. 各個國家在應對環境問題上必須協同作戰。

e/elevate public awareness of… 增強公衆意識

wable resources, non-renewable resources, fossil energy (petroleum, natural gas, coal) 可再生資源，不可再生資源，化石能源(石油，天然氣，煤)

ume, deplete, exhaust 消耗，耗光

tage/scarcity/lack of 短缺

a strain on the already stretched resources 是已經短缺的資源更加緊張

restation, illegal logging 砍伐森林

harge/emit green house gases/carbon dioxide 排放溫室氣體，二氧化碳

exhaust 汽車尾氣

-biodegradable/non-decomposable garbage 白色垃圾，不可降解垃圾

　　託福寫作環境類素材

一、Hi, everybody. This Monday, I'm heading to Alaska for a three-day tour of the state.

I've been looking forward to this for a long time. Not only because Alaska is one of the most beautiful places in a country that's full of beautiful places-but because I'll have several opportunities to meet with everyday Alaskans about what's going on in their lives. I'll travel throughout the state, meeting with Alaskans who live above the Arctic Circle, with Alaska natives, and with folks who earn their livelihoods through fishing and tourism. And I expect to learn a lot.

One thing I've learned so far is that a lot of these conversations begin with climate change. And that's because Alaskans are already living with its effects. More frequent and extensive wildfires. Bigger storm surges as sea ice melts faster. Some of the swiftest shoreline erosion in the world-in some places, more than three feet a year.

Alaska's glaciers are melting faster too, threatening tourism and adding to rising seas. And if we do nothing, Alaskan temperatures are projected to rise between six and twelve degrees by the end of the century, changing all sorts of industries forever.

二、This is all real. This is happening to our fellow Americans right now. In fact, Alaska's governor recently told me that four villages are in “imminent danger” and have to be relocated. Already, rising sea levels are beginning to swallow one island community.

Think about that. If another country threatened to wipe out an American town, we'd do everything in our power to protect ourselves. Climate change poses the same threat, right now.

That's why one of the things I'll do while I'm in Alaska is to convene other nations to meet this threat. Several Arctic nations have already committed to action. Since the United States and China worked together to set ambitious climate targets last year, leading by example, many of the world's biggest emitters have come forward with new climate plans of their own. And that's a good sign as we approach this December's global climate negotiations in Paris.

三、Now, one of the ways America is leading is by transitioning away from dirty energy sources that threaten our health and our environment, and by going all-in on clean, renewable energy sources like wind and solar. And Alaska has the natural resources to be a global leader in this effort.

Now even as we accelerate this transition, our economy still has to rely on oil and gas. As long as that's the case, I believe we should rely more on domestic production than on foreign imports, and we should demand the highest safety standards in the industry-our own. Still, I know there are Americans who are concerned about oil companies drilling in environmentally sensitive waters. Some are also concerned with my administration's decision to approve Shell's application to drill a well off the Alaskan coast, using leases they purchased before I took office. I share people's concerns about offshore drilling. I remember the BP spill in the Gulf of Mexico all too well.

　　託福寫作環境類範文

Topic:

agree or disagree--the environment issues are too complicated, so individuals can do nothing about it on their own

With the Climate Summit in Copenhagen reaching a dead-end and with the fictional movie 2012 turning into a blockbuster, environmental issues have yet again become the most heated topic all over the world. People debate over whether the governments or the individuals should take on the primary role in protecting environment and in fighting pollution. Some hold that individuals should take the initiative but I argue that it is the governments that should take the leading part. The following analysis will further strengthen my viewpoint. In the first place, environmental issues are too complicated and far-reaching for individuals to engage in. the most severe environmental issues today, such as global warming, various pollutions and preservation of wild species, are found in almost every country in the world. Individuals scattered across the globe can do very little to solve these problems without the mobilization and organization of their governments. The solution to environmental problems lies in the dedication and cooperation of all the governments in the world. Take global warming for an example. One person boycotting car use, or even a thousand people doing the same thing, won’t change the situation for a little bit. And after the unsuccessful climate summit in Copenhagen, we have realized how difficult it is to summon a global effort.

Secondly, it is human nature to focus on the immediate interests, which makes it hard for individuals to genuinely care about the environment. As an individual, we care the most about our own well-being and pay less attention to issues beyond our immediate interests. Like environmental protection. We don’t really worry about the gradual rising of sea level which will result in the submerging of small islands like Mal Dive. We may have lost a perfect honey moon destination, but there is still a bunch at hand. In this case, we should rely on the governments to urge and oblige their citizens to act altruistically and look into the big picture. For instance, the government may suspend factories that are emitting too much pollutant into the air or designate that cars with even and odd numbered licenses should take alternative days to go on street. When it comes to restrain our behavior for the sake of environmental protection, the government’s role is indispensible.