關於教育的雅思作文及分析

　　 教育是雅思寫作非常愛考的話題了，話不多說，看看小編給大家分享的關於教育的雅思作文及分析。

雅思大作文教育類話題

1. 教育應該包括哪些內容

母題：It is generally believed that education is of vital importance to the development of individuals and the well-being of societies. What should education consist of to fulfil both these functions?

提示：本題圍繞教育的兩大功能來展開(個人與社會)，準備好這篇文章，即可應付教育類話題中的最大分支—教育的功能，做到以不變應萬變。對於社會角度，可以從促進經濟發展、增加社會流動性(social mobility)、維護社會穩定這幾個方面來展開，對於個人，可以寫改變思維模式、有利於就業和便利生活來寫。

子題：大學應當教授理論知識還是實踐技能?大學的是應當把學生培養成合格的公民還是讓他們自己得益?準備未來職業最好的方法是上大學還是儘快離校積累工作經驗?大學要不要擴招?中學階段應當提供通才教育還是專才教育?要不要延長義務教育年限?要不要讓農村地區的學生更容易上學?老師要教學生如何判斷是非嗎?

2. 學校的科目誰來選擇

母題：Some people think that the government should decide which subjects students should study at the university, while others think that students should be allowed to apply for the subject they prefer. Discuss the two views and give your opinion.

提示：這類題目採取的策略就是“雙批判”，因爲題目中提供的兩種選擇往往都是錯誤的。

子題1：政府選課or 老師選課?學生選擇所有的科目or根據興趣自行選擇?

子題2：只有學術科目重要，體育和音樂這樣的課不重要，你同意嗎?要不要學國際新聞?要不要學歷史?要不要中學階段就學習外語?要不要學數學哲學這類的科目?

提示：子題2與母題聯繫不大，需要準備這些科目各自的優點。

3. 什麼樣的教學方式最好

母題：Many people use distance-learning programmes (study material post, TV, Internet, etc.) to study at home, but some people think that it cannot bring the benefit as much as attending college or university. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

提示：遠程教育最大的好處，就在於三個any：anybody, anywhere, any time. 缺點是缺乏師生之間以及學生之間的interaction, 缺乏教師的moral guidance, 因爲沒有體育課且久坐電腦前，會引發健康問題。

子題：私立學校好不好?留學好不好?要不要分快慢班?小組學習還是單獨學習好?

4. 誰來爲學費買單

母題：Some people believe that university students should pay all the cost of studies because university education only benefit the students themselves not the society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

提示：這些話題都有一個共同的特徵：高等教育只對學生自己有好處，因此學生應當自行爲高等教育買單。這類題目的寫法非常有規律，先駁斥這種理由，再交代學生自己支付學費的後果就可以了。

子題：政府要爲學生買單嗎?(缺點是給政府帶來經濟負擔，這類話題寫法和其它政府類話題一樣)

5. 家庭教育

母題：Some people say that children should obey the rules of their parents and teachers, while other people think children will not be well-prepared for their adult life if they are given too much control. Discuss in both sides and give your opinion.

提示：寫一下各自的好處就可以了，最後的結論是早年的時候要教授他們明辨是非，對於做錯的事情要懲罰，但是也要適可而止讓其興趣愛好得到自由發展。

子題：窮人家的孩子是否早當家?家長是否應該爲五歲小孩的犯罪負責?要不要把小孩趁早送到學校去?老師對兒童的智力和社會發展所起的作用大於家長嗎?同齡人壓力(peer pressure)的利弊?

　　雅思寫作教育類話題思路講解

題目分析：students in school or university learn more from classes of teachers than other resources(rnet or TV) do you agree or disagree?

這類題目又多次改頭換面地出現在考場中，所以大家對於這種頻繁光顧的話題一定要認真複習。沒準你就可以通過通過再現練習或者課堂的方式在考場上斬獲作文的高分。

文章結構第一段：開頭段，引出自己的觀點，即可以從老師身上學到更多的知識。

第二段：第一個分論點，認爲學習不僅僅是學習知識的簡單傳遞，而且還是師生間的互動。

第三段：第二個分論點，認爲從老師身上不僅可以學到知識，而且老師可以爲學生提供監管。第四段：駁論段，說明在學生也可以從其它方面資源地方學習。第五段： 自然結尾，重申主題。

範文：

The updated understanding of study and the cutting-edge technology(尖端科技) usher in an era when the students can have a variety of ways to acquire knowledge(學習知識). Although there are other forms to obtain knowledge and information, I am still the proponent(支持者) of the belief that students can learn more from their teachers than other y, to some degrees, is not a one-way input of knowledge, while it is the procedure of mutual interaction between teachers and students. In theconventional teaching and learning mode(傳統的教學和學習模式), teachers and students co-exist in an environment where they can have timely interaction. This means teachers can have a more comprehensive and directly understanding of their students’ shortcomings and strong points, which guarantees that students can learn more from the courses that are tailored(量體裁衣的，有針對性的)to their is apparent that students can obtain more knowledge from their teachers because teachers do not only function as craftsmen(匠人，工匠) who only impart knowledge(傳遞知識) but also serve as a supervisor or a guardian.

This is especially true in the case where students are less self-disciplined (自律的)and are inclined to go astray (誤入歧途)without the supervision and guidance of teachers. By comparison, others resources of learning such as Internet and TV sometimes are likely to make the students distracted due to a host of irrelevant information,(不相關信息) which will undermine (一點點削弱)their learning efficiency and make students learn is also true that students are likely to learn more from other resources. Internet and TV are two media where there are a wealth of (很多)knowledge and information ranging from science and humanity.

They are also the easily accessible platforms for the students who are in the remote places(偏遠地區)where the teaching resources are not so abundant (充足的)as that in more developed regions. However, other learning resources can hardly challenge the dominant role (主導地位)played by sum up, teachers are still the primary resource from whom the student can gain knowledge, although the influence of other learning resources cannot be underestimated.

雅思大作文教育類話題範文

題目：Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every what extent do you agree or disagree?

範文：

Although the idea of gender equality in society, is a laudable concept, I believe a more modest adjustment of severely gender-imbalanced courses would be more practical than a draconian imposition of a 50/50 balance in all university courses.

Some people feel that females are underrepresented and do not have equal opportunities in certain professions such as upper management and engineering while others believe society would be better served if more males worked in some professions such as nursing, translating and primary school teaching. Both groups feel that not only competition for university places but also social stereotyping plays a role here; that is, if a more gender-balanced workforce were visible, then more young people would feel that it would be socially acceptable for them to follow suit and enter professions that are traditionally associated with the opposite sex.

I agree with these arguments but the correction of gender inequality and imbalance in the workplace cannot take place in the universities only — changes should also be made in society as a whole, including education at the pre-university level. Furthermore, the sudden imposition of a rigid 50/50 gender balance in university classes, where there is usually, say, an 80/20 male/female ratio, would probably result in many highly qualified and highly motivated males losing out to some females who were not very academically qualified for those courses and possibly not very interested in pursuing those professions.

On the other hand, if the last 1.0% of class allotments in heavily imbalanced classes were reserved for the 'minority’ sex, and if academic standards were not drastically compromised in the process, then I believe society would benefit.